Requests the office of technology services to perform a risk assessment of the state's information technology infrastructure
Impact
The passage of HCR121 would result in a systematic evaluation of the information technology systems used within the executive branch of the Louisiana state government. This evaluation is expected to identify areas of inefficiency and vulnerability, offering a strategic overview that could lead to improved resource allocation. Furthermore, it emphasizes the need for timely reporting to the legislature, with expectations to address any potential social and economic impacts stemming from software and hardware failures, thereby influencing funding decisions and legislative action concerning technology upgrades in state agencies.
Summary
HCR121 is a concurrent resolution aimed at urging the division of administration, office of technology services, to conduct a comprehensive study of the current state of mission-critical information technology systems across various state agencies. The resolution highlights the importance of maintaining up-to-date and effective technology to ensure the delivery of services to citizens while mitigating risks posed by outdated or inefficient systems. It specifically requests an assessment of both the risks associated with aging technology and the potential costs due to inefficiencies and vulnerabilities that arise from not upgrading these systems.
Sentiment
The sentiment expressed in discussions surrounding HCR121 appears to be supportive of addressing the challenges presented by aging technology systems. Legislators recognized the necessity of this study as a proactive measure to prevent operational failures that could disrupt services. However, there may be underlying concerns regarding budget implications and the prioritization of technology investments that are likely to surface as recommendations from the study are made public.
Contention
While there does not appear to be significant contention surrounding the intent of HCR121, important debates may arise during the assessment phase and subsequent recommendations. Potential points of contention could involve disagreements over which systems require immediate attention, the prioritization of upgrades among state agencies, and the allocation of funds required to implement the improvements suggested by the assessment. Additionally, issues concerning data privacy and security may lead to discussions about the balance between transparency and the protection of sensitive information.
Requests the office of technology services to develop a survey of information technology systems used by local government, to compile responses, and to report to the legislature
Provides for a reorganization of the office of information technology and for procurement of information technology systems and services (OR -$24,700,000 GF EX See Note)
Establishes the Information Technology Infrastructure Fee to be assessed on certain state transactions to support the state's information technology infrastructure (OR INCREASE SD RV See Note)