Louisiana House Bill HCR46

Louisiana 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/25/17
• Refer: 4/26/17
• Report Pass: 5/10/17
• Engrossed: 5/22/17
• Refer: 5/24/17
• Passed: 5/25/17

Caption

Provides relative to the printing of certain statutes regarding public retirement systems that were unconstitutionally enacted

Impact

The resolution functions as a corrective measure to amend the official documents of the state regarding public retirement systems. By ceasing the printing of certain language and provisions from Act No. 483 of the 2012 Regular Session that was found unconstitutional, HCR46 conserves the integrity of Louisiana's legal statutes. It resolves confusion caused by outdated or improper statutory language and maintains the accountability of the printing processes concerning state laws.

Summary

HCR46 is a House Concurrent Resolution that addresses previous legislation concerning public retirement systems in Louisiana. Specifically, it seeks to stop the printing of certain statutory provisions that were enacted unconstitutionally as confirmed by the case Retired State Employees Association v. State. The resolution directs the Louisiana State Law Institute to ensure that unconstitutional language is not included in future publications of the Louisiana Revised Statutes, aiming for clarity and adherence to legal standards in state legislation.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCR46 has been largely supportive among state legislators. It represents a proactive approach toward correcting legal errors and ensuring that statutory language conforms with constitutional standards. There has been an expressed consensus on the importance of upholding constitutional law, as well as a recognition of the implications of printing inaccurate legal documents for both the state and its citizens.

Contention

While there does not appear to be significant controversy around the resolution itself, it reflects a larger narrative concerning the constitutionality of enacted laws. The resolution underscores the necessity of revisiting legislation that may have significant implications for public employees and the trustworthiness of governmental regulations. As such, it serves not only to correct specific provisions but also to reinforce the importance of due process in legislative enactment.