Provides an exception for portions of the Comite River, Pearl River, Tchefuncte River, Bogue Falaya River, Abita River, Amite River, and Bayou Manchac from provisions of the natural and scenic rivers program. (8/1/17)
Impact
If enacted, SB132 will impact the regulations governing the natural and scenic rivers of Louisiana by allowing greater access for drainage-related activities. This means that the aforementioned rivers will have controlled exemptions to typical restrictions on river operations, potentially facilitating local government and state efforts to manage flood risks and drainage needs more effectively. However, this change may raise concerns regarding environmental protection and the management of natural resources along these waterways.
Summary
Senate Bill 132 aims to amend the Louisiana Scenic Rivers Act by allowing specific exceptions for certain rivers in Louisiana. This legislation provides for clearing and snagging, as well as dredging operations conducted for drainage purposes in the Amite River, West Pearl River, Tangipahoa River, Tchefuncte River, Bogue Falaya River, Abita River, and Comite River. These operations are permitted to be conducted by political subdivisions, the state, or federal government under specified conditions outlined within the act.
Sentiment
The prevailing sentiment around SB132 appears to be supportive among those who prioritize effective drainage and flood management solutions. Local government officials and agencies may view this bill as a practical approach to dealing with drainage issues in the affected rivers. Conversely, environmental advocates and opponents may express concerns that this bill could lead to ecological impacts and may undermine the protective intentions of the Scenic Rivers Act.
Contention
A notable point of contention surrounding SB132 includes the balance between necessary infrastructure development and environmental preservation. Proponents argue that the exceptions provided in the bill are critical for addressing pressing drainage concerns, while opponents fear that the permissibility of dredging and clearing on these rivers may endanger wildlife habitats and undermine the scenic value of these natural resources. The discussions highlight a tension between practical governance and environmental stewardship in managing one's waterways.