Louisiana 2017 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB219

Introduced
3/31/17  
Introduced
3/31/17  
Refer
3/31/17  
Refer
3/31/17  
Refer
4/10/17  
Refer
4/10/17  
Report Pass
4/26/17  
Report Pass
4/26/17  
Engrossed
5/2/17  
Refer
5/3/17  
Report Pass
5/18/17  
Report Pass
5/18/17  
Enrolled
6/1/17  
Enrolled
6/1/17  
Chaptered
6/12/17  
Chaptered
6/12/17  
Passed
6/12/17  

Caption

Provides relative to certain hospital service districts. (8/1/17)

Impact

The enactment of SB 219 will have a significant impact on state laws by formalizing the composition and qualifications for the boards governing hospital service districts in the specified parishes. This aligns local governance with the expertise necessary to oversee healthcare services effectively. Moreover, it may influence how parishes with similar demographics manage their hospital services, as it establishes a precedent for board structures and qualifications that could be adopted in other contexts throughout the state.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 219 addresses the governance structure of hospital service districts in parishes of specific population ranges within Louisiana. The bill stipulates that in parishes with populations greater than 16,000 and less than 17,000, a hospital service district board will be established consisting of five commissioners. These commissioners are required to have specific qualifications, ranging from financial, legal, medical, business, and managerial expertise, ensuring a well-rounded governance structure for healthcare services in these districts.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 219 has generally been positive, as it aims to enhance healthcare governance in smaller parishes by ensuring that board members possess appropriate skills and knowledge necessary for effective management and decision-making. Proponents argue that such a structured approach to hospital board membership will lead to better healthcare outcomes and more efficiently run services, while counterarguments regarding the effectiveness of such governance models were minimal based on available records.

Contention

While no notable points of contention were explicitly documented, one potential area for discussion could involve how this bill might be perceived by various local entities and the engagement of community members in the appointment process of these board members. The requirement for expertise in specific fields may also raise questions about representation and accessibility for broader community interests. Overall, the operationalization of this bill will likely require continuous evaluation to ensure it meets the healthcare needs of the communities it serves.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.