Louisiana Senate Bill SB21

Louisiana 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/20/17
• Refer: 3/20/17
• Refer: 4/10/17

Caption

Provides for the reinstatement of the tax exemption on manufacturing machinery. (7/1/17) (OR -$22,000,000 GF RV See Note)

Impact

The passage of SB 21 is poised to significantly impact Louisiana's manufacturing industries by reinstating tax relief that had been temporarily suspended. Advocates of the bill argue that eliminating the tax on manufacturing machinery will foster a more favorable business environment, helping to retain and attract manufacturing investments. This change could lead to an increase in production capacity and economic growth at the state level, as manufacturers may be more inclined to purchase new equipment without the added tax burden.

Summary

Senate Bill 21, introduced by Senator Peacock, focuses on reinstating the sales tax exemption for manufacturing machinery and equipment in Louisiana. The bill aims to repeal the partial suspension of this exemption, which had subjected such purchases to a state sales tax rate of one percent until July 1, 2018. By reinstating this exemption, the bill seeks to alleviate the financial burden on manufacturers, potentially encouraging investment and job creation in the manufacturing sector.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment surrounding SB 21 appears to be positive among supporters within the manufacturing community, who view the reinstatement of the tax exemption as a critical step toward enhancing competitiveness. However, there may be concerns from fiscal conservatives who worry about the potential loss of tax revenue resulting from the reinstatement of the exemption, thereby creating a divide between pro-business advocates and those cautious about the state's revenue implications.

Contention

While the bill has garnered support, particularly from those within the manufacturing sector, some lawmakers and taxpayers may contend that reinstating the tax exemption could lead to a reduction in state revenues that fund essential services. The debate surrounding SB 21 highlights the ongoing discussions about balancing the need for economic incentives with the fiscal responsibilities of the state government to maintain services. As such, the tension between promoting economic growth and ensuring adequate funding for public resources could surface during deliberations in the legislature.