Louisiana 2018 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB102

Introduced
2/21/18  
Introduced
2/21/18  
Refer
2/21/18  
Refer
3/12/18  
Refer
3/12/18  
Report Pass
3/15/18  
Engrossed
3/26/18  
Engrossed
3/26/18  
Refer
3/27/18  
Refer
3/27/18  
Report Pass
4/24/18  
Report Pass
4/24/18  
Enrolled
5/2/18  
Chaptered
5/10/18  

Caption

Provides for the transfer of certain witness fee surplus funds within Lafourche Parish

Impact

The successful enactment of HB 102 holds considerable implications for the fiscal management of law enforcement resources and the judicial system within Lafourche Parish. By consolidating surplus witness fees into the criminal court fund, the bill aims to provide financial stability and ensure that funds are readily available for other judicial purposes. This provision can potentially optimize the management of public funds, reflecting a more efficient use of taxpayer money.

Summary

House Bill 102 introduces procedures for the management of witness fee surplus funds specifically within Lafourche Parish. The bill mandates that by April 30th each year, any surplus funds that exceed ten thousand dollars in the special fund allocated for witness fees for off-duty law enforcement officers should be transferred to the criminal court fund of Lafourche Parish. This effectively allows for the reallocation of excess funds potentially enhancing resources available for the court system in the parish.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HB 102 has been positive, as it addresses a systematic issue related to the handling of excess funds generated from witness fees for off-duty law enforcement work. Stakeholders likely perceive this legislation as a structured approach to promote financial accountability and effective allocation of resources within the local judicial system. However, caution may arise from discussions around the intricacies of fund management and the specific utilization of resources that are generated and subsequently redirected.

Contention

While HB 102 predominantly received support, there may be underlying contention regarding the potential variability in how surplus funds are managed post-transfer. Questions could arise about transparency in using the surplus funds within the criminal court fund, as stakeholders may seek assurance that such funds will be utilized appropriately for their intended purposes, rather than being absorbed into broader budgetary allocations that could dilute their effectiveness.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.