Louisiana 2018 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB177

Introduced
2/26/18  
Refer
2/26/18  
Refer
2/26/18  
Refer
3/12/18  
Refer
3/12/18  
Report Pass
3/19/18  
Report Pass
3/19/18  
Engrossed
3/27/18  
Refer
3/28/18  
Report Pass
4/30/18  
Report Pass
4/30/18  
Enrolled
5/10/18  
Enrolled
5/10/18  
Chaptered
5/15/18  
Chaptered
5/15/18  
Passed
5/15/18  

Caption

Extends the termination date of certain provisions authorizing a public entity to rehabilitate a levee not maintained with federal funds without public bids

Impact

The extension of the termination date from December 31, 2018, to December 31, 2022, allows public entities more time to undertake levee rehabilitation without the constraints of federal funding and public bidding processes. This amendment is expected to encourage local governments to address their levee maintenance issues more effectively, as funding mechanisms may differ significantly between federal and state or local resources.

Summary

House Bill 177 seeks to amend the Louisiana Revised Statutes, specifically R.S. 38:2212, by extending the termination date applicable to the rehabilitation of levees that are not maintained with federal funds and do not require public bidding. By reformulating the existing timeline for these rehabilitation efforts, the bill is designed to facilitate ongoing maintenance and repair of local levee systems, which are crucial for flood protection and environmental safety in the regions they serve.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 177 seems favorable, particularly among local officials and agencies concerned with flood management. Supporters argue that it provides necessary flexibility for managing public works projects critical to the safety and well-being of communities vulnerable to flooding. As there were no recorded votes against the bill, this suggests a consensus on the importance of levee maintenance among legislators.

Contention

Despite the supportive backdrop, some stakeholders may raise concerns about the absence of competitive bidding, which proponents argue could lead to more efficient project execution. However, critics may express apprehension regarding transparency and the potential for unchecked spending without public oversight. Overall, the debate primarily revolves around balancing necessary infrastructure maintenance with accountability and fiscal prudence.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.