Louisiana 2018 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB49

Introduced
2/2/18  
Introduced
2/2/18  
Refer
2/2/18  
Refer
2/2/18  
Refer
3/12/18  
Refer
3/12/18  
Report Pass
4/5/18  
Report Pass
4/5/18  
Engrossed
4/12/18  
Engrossed
4/12/18  
Refer
4/16/18  
Refer
4/16/18  
Report Pass
4/23/18  
Report Pass
4/23/18  
Enrolled
4/27/18  
Enrolled
4/27/18  
Chaptered
5/10/18  
Chaptered
5/10/18  
Passed
5/10/18  

Caption

Authorizes coastal restoration and protection projects as compensatory wetlands mitigation

Impact

The impact of HB 49 extends to how coastal wetlands are managed and preserved within the state. By permitting integrated projects to serve as mitigation, the bill aligns environmental restoration efforts with developmental needs, potentially streamlining the approval process for projects that may disturb wetlands. It ensures that ecological values can be offset with appropriate actions within the same watershed, fostering a balance between development and environmental preservation.

Summary

House Bill 49 amends existing legislation concerning the mitigation of coastal wetlands losses in Louisiana. The bill allows for the construction or implementation of integrated coastal protection projects to be used as compensatory wetlands mitigation, which is consistent with the state's master plan for coastal protection and restoration. This adjustment is aimed at enhancing efforts to protect and restore coastal ecosystems while facilitating necessary developments that may otherwise impact these areas.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment around HB 49 appears to be supportive, particularly among figures focused on environmental conservation and coastal management. By authorizing more flexible approaches to wetlands mitigation, supporters believe it advances the objectives of coastal restoration. However, it may also instigate debate among stakeholders concerned about the adequacy of compensatory measures and the potential for projects to overlook crucial ecological considerations.

Contention

Notably, the potential contention surrounding this bill revolves around the criteria for granting variances to the compensatory mitigation requirements. While the bill allows for exceptions when impracticability is demonstrated, this provision requires careful scrutiny to prevent misuse that could lead to environmental degradation. Critics may argue that the standards for ‘overriding public interest’ must be clearly defined to ensure that environmental protections are not compromised in favor of economic development.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.