Louisiana 2018 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB744

Introduced
3/28/18  
Introduced
3/28/18  
Refer
3/29/18  
Refer
3/29/18  
Report Pass
4/9/18  
Report Pass
4/9/18  
Engrossed
4/17/18  
Engrossed
4/17/18  
Refer
4/18/18  
Refer
4/18/18  
Report Pass
5/1/18  
Enrolled
5/9/18  
Enrolled
5/9/18  
Chaptered
5/18/18  
Chaptered
5/18/18  
Passed
5/18/18  

Caption

Provides for authority of courts in times of an emergency or disaster

Impact

The enactment of HB 744 amends the Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure to include provisions that grant courts the authority to issue legal orders even when they cannot physically operate within their designated areas. This is particularly significant in enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of the judicial system during crisis situations. By formalizing the process for courts to act in these circumstances, the bill aims to minimize delays in legal proceedings that may occur due to external disruptions.

Summary

House Bill 744, enacted during the 2018 Regular Session, addresses the powers of courts during emergencies or disasters. Specifically, the bill allows district courts and courts of limited jurisdiction in Louisiana to sign orders and judgments outside their territorial jurisdictions when prevented from operating normally due to a declared emergency. This measure is designed to ensure that judicial functions can continue during events that disrupt normal court operations, such as natural disasters or public health emergencies.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 744 appears to be supportive, as it fills a critical gap in disaster management protocols within the judicial framework. Legislators recognized the necessity of maintaining judicial functions during emergencies, which is crucial for upholding the rule of law and protecting citizens' rights. While specific opposition was not heavily documented, the potential challenges related to jurisdiction and oversight of such extraordinary powers were acknowledged.

Contention

Notably, while the bill seeks to streamline judicial processes during emergencies, it raises questions regarding the scope of authority granted to courts operating outside their jurisdictions. This aspect sparked discussions on the balance between efficient judicial response and the potential for overreach. Critics urged caution, emphasizing the need for adequate safeguards to ensure that the exercise of these powers does not undermine the principles of jurisdictional integrity or lead to judicial overreach.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.