Amends penalties relative to the crime of hazing (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF EX See Note)
Impact
The enactment of HB 78 will amend existing statutes related to hazing, specifically introducing a new section, R.S. 14:40.8, which outlines the definitions of hazing, the associated penalties, and the responsibilities of educational institutions in handling hazing incidents. Under the new law, individuals who commit acts of hazing that result in serious bodily injury or death could face fines up to $10,000 and imprisonment for up to five years, marking a significant escalation in the legal consequences surrounding these actions. This reflects a growing concern regarding the impact of hazing on student health and safety.
Summary
House Bill 78, also known as 'The Max Gruver Act', aims to address and significantly reform the penalties associated with hazing in educational institutions in Louisiana. The bill establishes the crime of criminal hazing and introduces strict, delineated penalties for individuals and organizations found guilty of such activities. This legislation is particularly timely in the wake of incidents related to hazing practices that have raised concerns about student safety and wellbeing.
Sentiment
The sentiment around HB 78 is largely supportive, especially among lawmakers and advocacy groups focused on improving student safety. Proponents laud the bill as a critical step in curbing dangerous practices that have historically gone unchecked. However, there are also concerns about the effectiveness of the legislation and whether it will truly lead to behavior changes among student organizations. Critics fear potential overreach and the implications it may have on student engagement in extracurricular activities, advocating for a balanced approach to fostering a safe environment without overcriminalizing typical experiences.
Contention
While the bill was broadly supported, notable points of contention include discussions around the responsibilities of organizations in reporting hazing and the penalties for those in leadership positions who fail to act. Provisions that impose financial penalties and the potential forfeiture of organizational rights have raised questions about accountability and the balance between punishment and education within student bodies. This dialogue emphasizes the need for educational institutions to actively engage in preventing hazing rather than merely penalizing it after the fact.
Creates the crime of abuse of persons with infirmities through electronic means and provides for criminal penalties and exceptions (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF EX See Note)
Relating to accountability of institutions of higher education, including educator preparation programs, and online institution resumes for public institutions of higher education.
Revises calculation of student financial need and provides circumstances for reduction of financial aid at institutions of higher education and proprietary institutions.
Revises calculation of student financial need and provides circumstances for reduction of financial aid at institutions of higher education and proprietary institutions.
Revises calculation of student financial need and provides circumstances for reduction of financial aid at institutions of higher education and proprietary institutions.