Re-creates the Department of State and the statutory entities made a part of the department by law. (6/30/18)
Impact
The enactment of SB 165 has implications for state law as it modifies sections of the Louisiana Revised Statutes, particularly R.S. 49:191. By re-creating the Department of State and delineating the termination dates for statutory entities, the bill helps maintain statutory authority and operational continuity for various entities that assist in governmental functions. This ensures that there is no lapse in authority or operational capability which could impact various state functions including records management, elections, and regulatory compliance.
Summary
Senate Bill 165 is a legislative measure that addresses the re-creation of the Department of State and its associated statutory entities in Louisiana. It establishes a clear timeline for the continuance of these statutory entities while also setting a specific termination date for their existence unless re-created. The bill was enacted to ensure that the Department of State continues to function without interruption, reflecting the ongoing necessity of its services and responsibilities within the state governance framework.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SB 165 seems to be predominantly positive as legislators recognized the importance of the Department of State and its entities in delivering essential services. The unanimous support during the House vote, with 91 yeas and no nays, reflects a bipartisan agreement on the necessity of the bill. Legislators expressed a shared commitment to ensure continued operations of vital state services, indicating that the bill was largely seen as a procedural necessity rather than a contentious issue.
Contention
While there may not be major points of contention regarding SB 165, discussions may arise concerning the broader implications of terminating the authority of statutory entities without timely re-creation. There could be concerns regarding whether the processes for re-creating these entities are being diligently followed. The bill's focus on statutory entities underscores the importance of proactive legislative measures to prevent disruptions in governance and service delivery.
Relating to the recusal or disqualification of a statutory probate judge or other judge authorized to hear probate, guardianship, or mental health matters, and the subsequent assignment of another judge.
Relating to the recusal or disqualification of a statutory probate judge or other judge authorized to hear probate, guardianship, or mental health matters, and the subsequent assignment of another judge.
Relating to the recusal or disqualification of a statutory probate judge or other judge authorized to hear probate, guardianship, or mental health matters, and the subsequent assignment of another judge.
Relating to the recusal or disqualification of a statutory probate judge or other judge authorized to hear probate, guardianship, or mental health matters, and the subsequent assignment of another judge.