Re-creates the Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry. (6/30/18)
Impact
By re-creating the Department of Agriculture and Forestry, SB167 ensures that the essential functions and regulations governing agriculture and forestry in Louisiana remain uninterrupted. The bill specifically outlines a termination date for the existing statutory authority, set for July 1, 2023, unless an earlier re-creation occurs. This serves to prevent any gap in oversight and operational capability, which is vital for maintaining the standards and practices crucial to the agriculture and forestry sectors, which significantly contribute to the state's economy.
Summary
Senate Bill 167 aims to re-create the Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry, affirming the statutory authority of the department and its entities. This legislation is crucial, as it not only re-establishes a key regulatory body but also outlines the timeline for the termination of statutory authority associated with the department. The re-creation will be effective as of June 30, 2018, ensuring continuity in the state's agricultural and forestry regulatory framework. The bill provides a structured approach to managing the existence of statutory entities created under the department's authority.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SB167 appears to be supportive, reflecting a consensus on the importance of maintaining a structured approach to agricultural and forestry management in Louisiana. Proponents of the bill argue that re-establishing the department is essential for protecting the interests of farmers, landowners, and those involved in the state's forestry practices. The unified support in the House, where the bill passed with a 92 to 0 vote, indicates a strong legislative backing and a recognition of the necessity of such regulatory bodies.
Contention
While there was considerable support for the re-creation of the Department of Agriculture and Forestry, concerns could arise regarding how the re-creation may impact various stakeholders within the industry. The bill's provisions about the expiration of statutory authority may lead to a potential reduction in flexibility for existing entities, and some stakeholders could question whether the department's re-establishment adequately addresses current agricultural challenges. However, the overall legislative process displayed minimal opposition, suggesting that any contention remains relatively subdued.
Relating to the recusal or disqualification of a statutory probate judge or other judge authorized to hear probate, guardianship, or mental health matters, and the subsequent assignment of another judge.
Relating to the recusal or disqualification of a statutory probate judge or other judge authorized to hear probate, guardianship, or mental health matters, and the subsequent assignment of another judge.
Relating to the recusal or disqualification of a statutory probate judge or other judge authorized to hear probate, guardianship, or mental health matters, and the subsequent assignment of another judge.
Relating to the recusal or disqualification of a statutory probate judge or other judge authorized to hear probate, guardianship, or mental health matters, and the subsequent assignment of another judge.