Louisiana Senate Bill SB50

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10
• Report Pass: 4/7/10
• Engrossed: 4/13/10
• Refer: 4/14/10
• Report Pass: 4/22/10
• Enrolled: 5/17/10
• Chaptered: 5/26/10
• Passed: 5/26/10

Caption

Re-creates the Department of Agriculture and Forestry. (6/30/10)

Impact

The passage of SB50 ensures a seamless continuation of services provided by the Department of Agriculture and Forestry, which plays a crucial role in the oversight of agricultural practices and forestry management statewide. Without re-creation, the department would face a statutory termination, potentially leading to disruptions in agricultural regulation and forestry management. This bill thus acts as a safeguard for ongoing operations, providing a clear directive for the timeline under which the statutory entities will operate in the future.

Summary

Senate Bill 50 aims to re-create the Department of Agriculture and Forestry of Louisiana along with the statutory entities associated with it. This bill is designed to reaffirm the existence and authority of the department as it addresses the termination timeline for statutory entities involved in agriculture and forestry. By implementing this bill, the legislature is indicating a commitment to maintain the operations and regulatory functions of the Department of Agriculture and Forestry in the state of Louisiana.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB50 appears generally supportive among stakeholders who recognize the importance of the Department of Agriculture and Forestry in ensuring effective management of Louisiana’s agricultural resources. Proponents argue that its re-creation is vital for maintaining agricultural standards which ultimately benefit farmers and consumers alike. There is an appreciation for the legislative process that seeks to uphold the functionality of the department, reflecting a broader recognition of its critical role in state law.

Contention

While there are limited points of contention directly indicated in the discussions around SB50, concerns generally focus on the appropriateness of the statutory timeline for termination and re-creation. Some members of the legislature and the public may question the necessity for such re-creations and whether this reflects a broader trend in governance that may impact other regulatory bodies. Ensuring that legislative authority is clear and accessible frequently emerges as a focus of discussion, particularly regarding accountability and efficient governance.