Louisiana 2018 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB282

Introduced
3/1/18  
Introduced
3/1/18  
Refer
3/1/18  
Refer
3/1/18  
Refer
3/12/18  
Refer
3/12/18  
Report Pass
3/21/18  
Engrossed
4/5/18  
Engrossed
4/5/18  
Refer
4/6/18  
Refer
4/6/18  
Refer
4/17/18  
Refer
4/17/18  
Refer
4/18/18  
Refer
4/26/18  
Refer
4/26/18  
Refer
4/27/18  
Refer
4/27/18  
Enrolled
5/18/18  
Enrolled
5/18/18  
Chaptered
5/31/18  
Chaptered
5/31/18  
Passed
5/31/18  

Caption

Provides relative to prescription drug pricing. (8/1/18) (EN NO IMPACT See Note)

Impact

The legislation amends existing insurance regulations and adds a new section pertaining to disclosure of prescription drug rebates and consumer cost burdens. Starting from January 1, 2020, health insurance issuers will be obliged to inform enrollees of any potential excess charges for covered drugs and provide annual data regarding rebate values. Therefore, it affects how health benefit plans operate within the state, aiming to give consumers a clearer picture of their drug costs and the rebates their insurers are receiving from drug manufacturers.

Summary

Senate Bill 282 focuses on enhancing transparency in prescription drug pricing by requiring health insurance issuers to disclose potential cost burdens to consumers. The bill defines an 'excess consumer cost burden' as any charge to an enrollee that exceeds what the health insurance issuer would pay and mandates that this information be communicated to enrollees in their coverage documents. This transparency is intended to protect consumers from unexpected high costs associated with their medications, particularly when insurance coverage does not fully offset expenses at the point of sale.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around SB 282 appears to be positive among consumer advocacy groups, as it enhances consumer rights and promotes cost awareness. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the confidentiality aspects of rebate information, which health insurance issuers are not required to disclose. This provision, while intended to protect trade secrets, has led to debates about the balance between corporate confidentiality and consumer rights to access complete information about their healthcare costs.

Contention

Notable points of contention within the discussions include the implications of confidentiality on consumer transparency and the enforcement of the disclosure requirements. Critics argue that while the intent of the bill is beneficial, the exclusion of specific rebate amounts could still leave consumers in the dark regarding their actual drug costs. Advocates counter that the bill is a significant step toward a more equitable healthcare system, emphasizing the need for clear communication around insurance policies and patient responsibilities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.