Louisiana 2018 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB66

Introduced
2/21/18  
Introduced
2/21/18  
Refer
2/21/18  
Refer
2/21/18  
Refer
3/12/18  
Report Pass
4/4/18  
Report Pass
4/4/18  
Engrossed
4/11/18  
Refer
4/12/18  
Refer
4/12/18  
Report Pass
4/26/18  
Report Pass
4/26/18  
Enrolled
5/14/18  
Enrolled
5/14/18  
Chaptered
5/23/18  
Chaptered
5/23/18  
Passed
5/23/18  

Caption

Provides relative to admission to treatment facility for mental illness pursuant to emergency certificate. (8/1/18)

Impact

The legislation is significant as it aims to streamline the process of admitting individuals to mental health facilities, especially in times of crisis. By expanding the criteria for who can complete the required examinations, the bill intends to ensure more individuals receive timely treatment. However, it also emphasizes that failure to conduct a proper examination before issuing an emergency certificate could result in gross negligence claims against medical practitioners.

Summary

Senate Bill 66 focuses on the admission procedures for individuals requiring immediate treatment for mental illness or substance-related disorders. The bill amends existing laws regarding emergency certificates used to admit patients to treatment facilities, establishing clearer protocols for health professionals who can execute these certificates. Specifically, the bill allows for examinations to be conducted via telemedicine, which can enhance access to care for individuals in need, provided a qualified healthcare professional is present during the examination.

Sentiment

General sentiment around SB 66 appears to be supportive among healthcare providers and stakeholders focusing on mental health services. The provision allowing telemedicine for examinations is particularly praised for its potential to improve patient access to necessary care. Nonetheless, there may be concerns about the adequacy of oversight and the quality of care provided in emergency situations through telemedicine, which could polarize opinions on the bill's effectiveness.

Contention

Despite its advantages, opposition may arise from concerns about relying on telemedicine for critical evaluations without adequate in-person assessments. Opponents may argue that telemedicine lacks the personal touch required for such sensitive examinations, possibly jeopardizing patient safety and the effectiveness of the emergency care process. There is also a need to ensure that training and standards are upheld among those involved in the telemedicine process to prevent any missteps in emergency treatment.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.