Louisiana 2019 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB242

Introduced
3/27/19  
Introduced
3/27/19  
Refer
3/27/19  
Refer
3/27/19  
Refer
4/8/19  
Refer
4/8/19  
Report Pass
5/1/19  
Report Pass
5/1/19  
Engrossed
5/14/19  
Engrossed
5/14/19  
Refer
5/15/19  
Refer
5/15/19  
Report Pass
5/22/19  
Report Pass
5/22/19  
Enrolled
5/30/19  
Enrolled
5/30/19  
Chaptered
6/4/19  
Passed
6/4/19  

Caption

Prohibits certain claims fees assessed by health insurers or pharmacy benefit managers

Impact

The enactment of HB 242 is expected to impact pharmacy operations significantly, particularly by preventing late-surprise fees. This protection aims to make the business environment for pharmacists more transparent and manageable, potentially stabilizing their revenue streams and enhancing overall healthcare delivery. By addressing the financial strains on pharmacies, especially independent ones, the bill seeks to improve the accessibility and affordability of pharmaceutical care for patients.

Summary

House Bill 242 aims to amend existing regulations concerning the assessment of pharmacy claims fees by health insurance issuers and pharmacy benefit managers in Louisiana. The bill explicitly prohibits these entities from directly or indirectly charging pharmacists or pharmacies for certain fees related to claim processing. These fees cannot be imposed if they are not apparent at the time the claim is processed, are not detailed in the remittance advice, or occur after the initial adjudication of the claim. The intent is to protect pharmacists from unexpected costs that could undermine their ability to operate sustainably.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 242 appears to be largely positive among pharmacists and pharmacy advocates who view this bill as a necessary measure to enhance financial protections for their profession. There may, however, be concerns among some healthcare insurers and pharmacy benefit managers who could view the restrictions on fee assessments as limiting their operational flexibility. Overall, the bill fosters a sentiment of promoting fair practices within the healthcare insurance framework.

Contention

While the bill garnered unanimous support in the Senate with a final passage vote of 35-0, there may still be underlying tensions regarding it. The discussion may revolve around the balance between safeguarding pharmacists and ensuring that pharmacy benefit managers can operate effectively without undue restrictions on their ability to assess appropriate fees for their services. The implications for how such regulations might affect insurance premiums and pharmacy operations could be a focal point of contention among various stakeholders.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.