Louisiana House Bill HB389

Louisiana 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/19
• Refer: 3/29/19
• Refer: 4/8/19
• Report Pass: 5/1/19
• Engrossed: 5/15/19
• Refer: 5/16/19
• Report Pass: 5/29/19
• Enrolled: 6/3/19
• Chaptered: 6/20/19
• Passed: 6/20/19

Caption

Provides for naming the supreme court building after Pascal F. Calogero, Jr.

Impact

The passing of HB 389 has implications for the naming conventions of state buildings, particularly those associated with the judiciary. By enshrining the name of a pivotal judicial figure into the built environment, the legislation not only acknowledges the historical significance of Chief Justice Calogero's service but also sets a precedent for future naming practices for judicial facilities. This action enhances the visibility and recognition given to Supreme Court Justices who have significantly impacted Louisiana's legal landscape.

Summary

House Bill 389 proposes to officially designate the Louisiana Supreme Court building, located in New Orleans, as the 'Chief Justice Pascal F. Calogero, Jr. Courthouse'. This designation serves to honor Chief Justice Calogero for his extensive contributions to the judicial system in Louisiana and solidifies his legacy within the state. The bill encapsulates the value placed on past judicial leaders and seeks to reflect that in the state's infrastructure and landmarks.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be positive, with a unified legislative support as it passed with a unanimous vote. The spirit of the legislation is rooted in respect and appreciation for legal history and the figures who have shaped it. The decision to name the courthouse after Calogero suggests an agreement across various political lines on the importance of recognizing contributions to public service in meaningful ways.

Contention

While the bill enjoyed broad support in its passage, there exists potential contention in the naming of public properties after individuals, particularly concerning who might be elevated in a similar manner in the future. Critics might argue about some of the criteria and processes involved in naming buildings, reflecting broader discussions about representation and legacy. However, in this instance, there seem to be no notable points of contention highlighted in the discussions or voting process surrounding HB 389.