Louisiana 2019 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB436

Introduced
3/29/19  
Refer
3/29/19  
Refer
3/29/19  
Refer
4/8/19  

Caption

Provides for the installation of telecommunication lines relative to a railroad right-of-way

Impact

The bill is intended to simplify interactions between telecommunications companies and railroad corporations, reducing unnecessary costs associated with infrastructure development. Under the proposed law, telecommunication companies will be required to give 30-day notice to the relevant railroads prior to beginning any crossings, along with proof of insurance. Additionally, the bill stipulates that telecommunications companies pay a one-time crossing fee of up to $500, promoting cost-effective installation of telecommunication services in the state. This would align the bill with state efforts to enhance telecommunications infrastructure and service availability.

Summary

House Bill 436, introduced by Representative Jay Morris, aims to provide a regulatory framework for telecommunications companies to install lines that cross railroad tracks. The bill builds upon existing laws allowing telecommunication companies to construct infrastructure along and parallel to railroads, but adds specifications for crossing under or over railroad tracks. The legislation seeks to streamline the process for telecommunication companies by requiring notifications to railroads while limiting additional fees and regulatory hurdles imposed by railroad corporations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 436 appears to be cautiously optimistic among stakeholders in the telecommunications sector, viewing the bill as a means to facilitate the expansion of communication networks with minimal financial burden. However, there are concerns from railroad corporations regarding potential safety and liability issues that could arise from constructions crossing their rights-of-way. Some stakeholders emphasize the need for clear communication protocols and robust safety measures to ensure that the interests of both telecommunications providers and railways are addressed.

Contention

While the proposed bill aims to streamline and clarify the approval process, opposition arises from railroad operators who concern themselves with liability implications and the safety of railroad operations. The bill restricts railroads from creating additional regulations concerning crossings, which some rail stakeholders argue could lead to safety oversights. Given the bill's provisions allow telecommunications companies to commence constructions after 60 days without an agreement on the timing, this could further exacerbate tensions between the two industries.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

AZ HB2602

Railroads; telecommunications corporations; wire-crossing agreements

NH HB1627

Relative to recodifying certain laws concerning railroads, transportation, and telecommunications.

LA HR40

Urges and requests the House Committee on Commerce to study the effects that the railroads have on broadband deployment

LA HCR22

Urges and requests the House Committee on Commerce and the Senate Committee on Commerce, Consumer Protection, and International Affairs to study the effects that the railroads have on broadband deployment

MO SB71

Authorizes electrical corporations to operate and use broadband services

MO SB848

Allows electrical corporations to operate and use broadband infrastructure

CA SB385

Public Utilities Commission: reports: programs: studies: ex parte communications.

LA SB147

Prohibits any device from being used to access, read, or post to a social networking site while operating a motor vehicle and requires tests administered to driver's license applicants include the applicant's knowledge of distracted driving issues. (8/1/13)