Louisiana 2019 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB438

Introduced
3/29/19  
Introduced
3/29/19  
Refer
4/22/19  
Report Pass
5/8/19  
Report Pass
5/8/19  
Engrossed
5/21/19  
Engrossed
5/21/19  
Refer
5/22/19  
Refer
5/22/19  
Report Pass
5/27/19  
Report Pass
5/27/19  
Enrolled
6/4/19  
Enrolled
6/4/19  
Chaptered
6/11/19  
Chaptered
6/11/19  
Passed
6/11/19  

Caption

Provides relative to the classified police service in the city of Baton Rouge

Impact

The enactment of HB 438 will impact the procedures governing the certification and appointment of officers within the police department. By ensuring that vacancies are filled according to a structured and merit-based system, the bill seeks to promote professional standards and effectiveness in law enforcement operations. The addition of these provisions could also streamline the hiring process, creating a more efficient response to staffing needs within the police department.

Summary

House Bill 438 primarily addresses the classified police service in the city of Baton Rouge. It aims to establish a clear procedure for filling vacancies within the police department. Specifically, the bill stipulates that if a vacant position cannot be filled through reinstatement or reemployment, the board must certify the names of eligible candidates from the promotional list based on their ranking. This legislative framework is intended to enhance transparency and fairness in the appointment process for police personnel in Baton Rouge.

Sentiment

The sentiment around the bill is generally positive among law enforcement agencies and supporters of structured recruitment processes. Advocates argue that HB 438 promotes a merit-based approach to appointments, which is essential for maintaining public trust in the police force. However, there may be concerns regarding how it might affect existing personnel and their promotional opportunities, which could create friction within the department.

Contention

While the bill presents a more organized approach to filling vacancies, some contention might arise regarding the definition of eligibility on promotional lists and how candidates are evaluated. Critics could argue that it may lead to potential biases or a lack of flexibility in addressing varied departmental needs, especially in situations requiring immediate staffing changes. These concerns indicate that while the bill is aimed at improving the framework, its practical implications will need to be carefully managed.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.