Louisiana 2019 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB572

Introduced
3/29/19  
Introduced
3/29/19  
Refer
3/29/19  
Refer
3/29/19  
Refer
4/8/19  

Caption

Establishes requirements for transportation network companies

Impact

The enactment of HB 572 will have significant implications for local governance as it restricts local governmental subdivisions from imposing additional license fees or regulatory requirements beyond what is established in state law. This could centralize authority over TNC operations at the state level, limiting local jurisdictions' control over transportation policies. Additionally, TNCs must comply with strict record-keeping and audit protocols, which are designed to promote operational accountability and safety compliance within the ride-sharing industry.

Summary

House Bill 572 establishes a regulatory framework for transportation network companies (TNCs) in Louisiana. The bill outlines definitions, fees, and operational requirements for TNCs, aiming to standardize regulations to enhance safety and operational clarity for companies and drivers. It includes provisions for fare transparency, requiring companies to disclose fare calculation methods and provide electronic receipts for rides. Furthermore, it mandates TNCs to adopt nondiscrimination policies and apply laws related to the treatment of service animals, ensuring equitable service to all riders.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 572 is mixed among various stakeholders. Proponents, including many within the ride-sharing industry, support the bill for creating a cohesive regulatory environment that facilitates business operations and rider safety. In contrast, local government representatives and some advocacy groups express concern that the bill undermines local autonomy, limiting their ability to tailor regulations to address specific community needs. The tension between state-level regulation versus local governance is a focal point of the discussions surrounding this bill.

Contention

One of the notable points of contention is related to the fees that local jurisdictions can impose on TNCs. While the bill allows local governments to impose specific per-trip fees, they are prohibited from implementing additional taxes or licensing requirements. This has raised concerns among local leaders about their capacity to manage and fund local transportation infrastructure effectively. Additionally, the operational requirements for TNCs mandate rigorous background checks and record-keeping, which some argue could impose undue burdens on smaller companies trying to enter the market.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

LA HB575

Establishes requirements for transportation network companies (EN +$115,000 SG EX See Note)

LA HB749

Provides relative to transportation network company requirements

LA SB332

Requires district offices of the Department of Transportation and Development to publish on the internet information regarding construction and maintenance work within the district. (8/1/18) (EN SEE FISC NOTE SD EX See Note)

LA HB527

Establishes safety, reliability, and access requirements for Transportation Network Companies (RR INCREASE SG EX See Note)

TX HB100

Relating to the regulation of transportation network companies; requiring an occupational permit; authorizing a fee.

CT SB01448

An Act Concerning Transportation Network Companies And Drivers.

CT SB01487

An Act Concerning Transportation Network Companies And Third-party Delivery Companies.

CT HB07126

An Act Regulating Transportation Network Companies And Taxicabs.