Louisiana House Bill HB85

Louisiana 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/19/19
• Refer: 3/19/19
• Refer: 4/8/19
• Report Pass: 4/24/19
• Engrossed: 4/30/19
• Refer: 5/1/19
• Report Pass: 5/14/19
• Enrolled: 6/5/19
• Chaptered: 6/20/19
• Passed: 6/20/19

Caption

Provides relative to criteria for making awards to crime victims

Impact

The enactment of this bill will have significant implications for Louisiana's crime victim reparations process. By preventing the denial or reduction of reparations based on a victim's criminal history, HB85 prioritizes the rights and recovery of victims. It reflects a growing understanding that previous convictions should not impede a victim's ability to receive support for the crimes committed against them. This change may enhance the accessibility of reparations for many victims who otherwise might feel discouraged to seek help due to their past.

Summary

House Bill 85 seeks to amend criteria regarding reparations for crime victims in Louisiana by ensuring that specific factors, such as prior convictions or current probation or parole status, cannot be used to deny or reduce reparations awards. This legislation aims to provide clarity and fairness in the reparations process, making it more accessible to victims regardless of their past legal troubles. The intent is to support victims in their recovery and ensure they are not further victimized by the legal system's state of affairs.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB85 appears to be positive, especially among advocates for victims' rights and criminal justice reform. Supporters argue that the bill is a step in the right direction toward an equitable reparative justice system that acknowledges the complexities of individuals' histories while still providing necessary support for those who have suffered from crimes. However, some concerns may linger about the implications for the reparations framework and how these changes will be enforced operationally.

Contention

One notable point of contention may arise around the balance of justice and victim support, particularly regarding the inclusion of individuals with criminal backgrounds in the reparations scheme. While proponents champion this bill as progressive and inclusive, some may argue about potential misuse of reparations or discrepancies in who qualifies for assistance based on broader societal attitudes towards crime and punishment. The discussion points to a larger conversation about rehabilitation, victim support, and the integrity of the reparations system.