Louisiana House Bill HCR32

Louisiana 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/17/19
• Refer: 4/22/19

Caption

Suspends the .45% state sales and use tax levy imposed in R.S. 47:321.1 until 60 days after final adjournment of the 2020 R.S. (OR -$392,000,000 GF RV See Note)

Impact

The suspension of the .45% tax could provide financial relief for citizens, effectively reducing the overall tax rate during this period. This could lead to increased consumer spending as residents benefit from lower prices due to the tax suspension. The resolution signifies a shift in the state's fiscal strategy, recognizing a stronger budgetary situation compared to the time when the tax was initially enacted due to a projected fiscal crisis. By suspending this tax, state lawmakers aim to enhance economic conditions for residents.

Summary

HCR32 is a House Concurrent Resolution proposal that seeks to temporarily suspend the .45% state sales and use tax levied in Louisiana under R.S. 47:321.1. The resolution calls for this suspension to remain in effect until 60 days after the final adjournment of the 2020 Regular Session of the Legislature. The resolution comes in the context of improved financial conditions for the state, which has reported surpluses in recent fiscal years and an increased revenue estimate for the upcoming fiscal year, indicating a lesser need for this additional tax burden on residents.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HCR32 appears to lean towards fiscal prudence and relief for taxpayers. Supporters likely appreciate the temporary relief from taxes, viewing it as a reflection of sound economic management. However, there may be concerns from those who believe that suspending this revenue source could potentially impact future state funding or services that rely on these tax revenues. Overall, the discussion around the bill reflects a positive outlook toward the state's financial health juxtaposed with caution about long-term implications.

Contention

While there may be broad support for the temporary suspension of the sales tax, points of contention could arise regarding the sustainability of this decision. Critics might argue that the removal of such a revenue stream, even temporarily, might jeopardize funding for vital state services. Moreover, the discussion could delve into deeper fiscal policies concerning how the state should manage its budget surplus and whether reliance on short-term tax adjustments is the best strategy for long-term financial stability.