Louisiana 2019 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB13

Introduced
2/22/19  
Introduced
2/22/19  
Refer
2/22/19  
Refer
2/22/19  
Refer
4/8/19  
Refer
4/8/19  
Report Pass
4/9/19  
Report Pass
4/9/19  
Engrossed
4/16/19  
Engrossed
4/16/19  
Refer
4/17/19  
Refer
4/17/19  
Report Pass
5/2/19  
Enrolled
5/29/19  
Enrolled
5/29/19  
Chaptered
6/1/19  
Chaptered
6/1/19  
Passed
6/1/19  

Caption

Provides for a surviving spouse benefit to resume in certain circumstances. (2/3 - CA10s29(F)) (7/1/2019) (EN INCREASE APV)

Impact

The enactment of SB 13 would specifically modify R.S. 11:1316(C) concerning the State Police Retirement System. It allows surviving spouses whose benefits were forfeited due to remarriage to resume receiving those benefits upon the death of or divorce from their new spouse. As such, the bill offers a safeguard for families dealing with the loss of their loved ones, emphasizing the importance of providing ongoing support even amidst changes in marital status.

Summary

Senate Bill 13, known as the Trooper William Michael Kees Act, focuses on enhancing benefits for surviving spouses of state police officers who have died either in the line of duty or due to intentional acts of violence. Specifically, the bill amends the existing law to allow certain surviving spouses to reinstate their benefits under particular circumstances. Previously, benefits could be forfeited under certain conditions; however, this bill aims to ease some of those restrictions and ensure continued support for spouses affected by such tragedies.

Sentiment

Sentiment towards SB 13 appears to be generally positive among legislators, as evidenced by its unopposed passage in the Senate with a 34-0 vote. The bill addresses a significant need for support among surviving spouses, which resonates well with the community and legislative members alike. There is a shared appreciation for the sacrifices made by law enforcement personnel and the desire to ensure their families are taken care of in their absence.

Contention

While the discussions around the bill did not highlight major contention, opposition could arise from concerns regarding the financial implications of reinstating previously forfeited benefits. Critics may question the long-term sustainability of such benefits, especially if there are increased claims following the amendments. However, these concerns were not prominent in the legislative discussions, suggesting a unified front in recognizing the importance of the benefits at stake.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.