Louisiana Senate Bill SB145

Louisiana 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/27/19
• Refer: 3/27/19
• Refer: 4/8/19
• Report Pass: 4/24/19
• Engrossed: 4/29/19
• Refer: 4/30/19
• Report Pass: 5/14/19
• Enrolled: 5/29/19
• Chaptered: 6/20/19
• Passed: 6/20/19

Caption

Provides relative to human trafficking. (gov sig) (EN INCREASE GF EX See Note)

Impact

The introduction of this bill is expected to impact existing state laws by formalizing the state's approach to human trafficking through the establishment of clear guidelines and goals for victim services. By outlining specific aims—such as ensuring safe placements, adequate funding, and stakeholder partnerships—the bill seeks to increase the effectiveness of services available to victims. The ongoing reporting requirements to the Senate and House Committees on Health and Welfare ensure that there is accountability and ongoing assessment of the model's implementation.

Summary

Senate Bill 145 establishes a framework for addressing human trafficking in Louisiana by creating a coalition led by the Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS). This coalition is tasked with developing a comprehensive human trafficking victim services delivery model intended to streamline the support and resources available for juvenile victims. The bill emphasizes collaboration among various stakeholders, including health departments and children's advocacy organizations, to enhance the state's overall response to human trafficking incidents.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB145 has been positive, particularly among legislators and advocacy groups who focus on child welfare and protection. Supporters have praised the bill for its proactive measures to combat human trafficking and provide necessary resources to victims. However, there may also be concerns about the adequacy of funding and the ability of the coalition to meet its ambitious goals amidst bureaucratic challenges.

Contention

Despite the general support for SB145, notable points of contention may arise around the implementation phase, particularly regarding funding levels and resource allocation. Critics may question whether the state's financial commitment will be sufficient to achieve the coalition's goals, potentially impacting the quality and scope of the services delivered. Additionally, the effectiveness of inter-agency coordination could be challenged, as different departments work together to realize the bill’s objectives.