Louisiana Senate Bill SB175

Louisiana 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/27/19
• Refer: 3/27/19
• Refer: 4/8/19

Caption

Requires the Department of Environmental Quality to investigate certain complaints from the public. (8/1/19) (OR +$1,620,696 GF EX See Note)

Impact

The enactment of SB 175 is expected to significantly impact how environmental complaints are handled by the DEQ, allowing for more timely interventions at facilities suspected of violations. By establishing a clear requirement for inspections in response to public input, the bill strengthens the DEQ's role in environmental enforcement and can potentially lead to quicker resolutions of issues pertaining to environmental and public health concerns. The law emphasizes accountability by ensuring that facilities facing repeated complaints are monitored more closely.

Summary

Senate Bill 175 seeks to enhance the authority of the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) by requiring it to investigate specific public complaints regarding potential violations of environmental law. The bill mandates that upon receiving five or more complaints about a facility, the DEQ must conduct a special inspection within 24 hours. This rapid response mechanism aims to address concerns regarding imminent environmental dangers more efficiently, thereby improving regulatory oversight on facilities that may be in violation of state environmental laws.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding SB 175 appears to be supportive, particularly among environmental advocacy groups and constituents concerned about pollution and environmental safety. Supporters likely view the bill as a necessary step toward greater transparency and responsiveness within the DEQ, fostering public trust in environmental management. Nonetheless, there could be opposition from facility operators who may fear increased scrutiny and the potential for enforcement actions based on complaints that may not be substantiated.

Contention

Notable points of contention related to SB 175 may revolve around the balance between regulatory oversight and the burden placed on businesses. While proponents argue that the bill is essential for protecting the environment and public health, opponents might express concerns regarding the potential for misuse of the complaint mechanism, fearing that it could lead to unwarranted inspections or harassment of compliant facilities. This aspect of the debate highlights an ongoing tension between environmental protection efforts and the operational freedoms of businesses.