Louisiana 2019 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB179

Introduced
3/27/19  
Introduced
3/27/19  
Refer
3/27/19  
Refer
3/27/19  
Refer
4/8/19  
Refer
4/8/19  
Report Pass
5/13/19  

Caption

Provides how mineral royalties are classified and creates a lien for mineral royalties due to the state. (8/1/19)

Impact

The legislation is expected to impact state laws concerning mineral rights and financial transactions related to mineral leases. By reclassifying royalties, Senate Bill 179 aims to provide clearer legal definitions that could affect how payments are processed and what is considered an obligation under mineral leases. The new lien provision gives the state additional leverage in enforcing payment obligations, which may change dynamics for lessees and lessors engaged in such agreements.

Summary

Senate Bill 179, introduced by Senator Allain, addresses the classification of mineral royalties and establishes a statutory lien for royalties owed to the state. The bill amends existing statutes to clarify that royalties for mineral production are not classified as rent, thereby distinguishing financial obligations related to leases. A notable addition is the creation of a lien on any oil and gas produced on state-leased lands, ensuring that the state can secure payment for royalties and related lease obligations.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment around the bill seems to be cautious but positive, with supporters appreciating the clarity it brings to mineral royalty contracts and the state's authority in enforcing its claims. The recognition of royalties as distinct from rent is particularly seen as a positive step towards enhancing the state's ability to manage its mineral assets. However, there may also be concerns regarding the implications for lessees, as the added lien could potentially complicate their obligations under existing contracts.

Contention

One of the notable points of contention related to SB 179 is the balance between protecting state interests and the operational freedom of lessees. Some stakeholders worried that increasing state authority in the financial aspects of mineral leases might lead to increased costs or bureaucratic hurdles for those engaged in oil and gas production. The discussions around the bill suggest a need for careful consideration of both revenue generation for the state and fair treatment of companies engaged in mineral extraction.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

LA SB328

Provides that certain mineral royalties due to the state are not rent. (8/1/18)

LA HB223

Provides relative to the timely payment of royalties to a mineral lessor

LA HB1520

Royalties; and to provide a penalty.

LA SR159

Requests the Louisiana State Law Institute to study and make recommendations regarding the classification of mineral royalties for the purposes of bankruptcy proceedings.

LA HCR73

Requests the Louisiana Mineral Law Institute to study and make recommendations relative to timely payment of mineral royalties

LA SB242

Provides for a continuing security interest clause in mineral leases. (8/1/19)

LA SB124

Revises provisions relating to the tax upon the net proceeds of minerals and royalties of mining operations. (BDR 32-908)

LA HB455

Provides relative to rights in minerals

LA SB424

Provides relative to the employment of special attorneys or counsel to recover royalties due the state. (gov sig)

LA SB168

Provides for liberative prescription on mineral leases on state property. (8/1/25)

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.