Louisiana Senate Bill SB183

Louisiana 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/27/19
• Refer: 3/27/19
• Refer: 4/8/19

Caption

Provides relative to the Tulane legislative scholarships.

Impact

The impact of SB 183 extends to regulations governing educational scholarships in Louisiana. By enforcing specific eligibility criteria and prohibiting certain individuals from receiving scholarships, the law aims to promote fairness and transparency in the awarded scholarships. Additionally, the requirement that information regarding the scholarship program is made publicly accessible on the legislature's website intends to enhance awareness and increase opportunities for eligible students statewide. This move may bolster educational equity and ensure that a broader range of students can benefit from such financial assistance.

Summary

Senate Bill 183, known as the 'Legislative Scholarship Fairness Act', proposes amendments to the Tulane Legislative Scholarship Program, which allows Louisiana legislators to appoint students for free tuition at Tulane University. The bill clarifies the eligibility criteria, ensuring that only Louisiana residents can receive the scholarship while setting strict exclusions for family members of legislators and elected officials. Effective from the 2020-2021 academic year, the bill establishes rules for the selection process administered by the Office of Student Financial Assistance, emphasizing an open competition based on demonstrated need when no qualified candidates are available from a legislator's district.

Sentiment

General sentiment regarding SB 183 appears positive as it aligns with reforms to enhance transparency and fairness within scholarship programs. Supporters highlight the benefits of increasing accessibility to education for Louisiana residents and eliminating conflicts of interest related to family connections in scholarship grants. However, some critics may express concerns regarding the restrictions placed on eligibility, arguing that it could inadvertently limit opportunities for deserving students who might otherwise qualify under different criteria.

Contention

Notable points of contention in the discussions surrounding SB 183 may center on the perceived fairness of imposing family relationship exclusions for scholarship eligibility. While proponents argue this fosters impartiality, detractors may argue that such stipulations can disadvantage students with legitimate aspirations but familial connections. Furthermore, the administrative burden placed on the Office of Student Financial Assistance in implementing these rules and ensuring compliance could also be a topic of debate, focusing on how efficiently the program can operate without undue complications.