Louisiana 2019 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB233

Introduced
4/17/19  
Introduced
4/17/19  
Refer
4/17/19  
Report Pass
4/29/19  
Engrossed
5/2/19  
Engrossed
5/2/19  
Refer
5/6/19  
Refer
5/6/19  
Report Pass
5/20/19  
Enrolled
6/1/19  
Enrolled
6/1/19  
Chaptered
6/11/19  
Chaptered
6/11/19  

Caption

Increases "contract limit" that requires public bid for public work related to drainage projects done by regular maintenance employees in St. Charles Parish. (8/1/19)

Impact

The legislation is expected to significantly impact public works related to drainage in St. Charles Parish. The increase in the contract limit allows local authorities more flexibility and resources to address local maintenance needs promptly. It potentially reduces bureaucratic delays, thereby making public works operations more efficient. Additionally, the annual adjustment of the contract limit based on the Consumer Price Index ensures that the law remains relevant with inflation, further supporting ongoing maintenance projects.

Summary

Senate Bill 233 seeks to amend existing laws regarding public works projects in St. Charles Parish, specifically by increasing the threshold for contracts that require public bidding. The bill sets the new contract limit for drainage projects handled by regular maintenance employees at $250,000. This change aims to streamline operations and allow more work to be done without the lengthy and sometimes costly process of soliciting public bids, thereby speeding up maintenance and repair efforts.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB 233 appears to be positive among those who support local governance and the efficiency of public works. Proponents argue that the bill encourages timely responses to local issues and enhances the ability of St. Charles Parish to manage its infrastructure. The bill passed unanimously, indicating a strong bipartisan agreement on its merits and necessity for the community.

Contention

While there seems to be broad support for SB 233, some concerns might arise regarding transparency and accountability when public bidding is not mandated for larger contracts. Critics may argue that reducing the need for competitive bidding could lead to favoritism or insufficient scrutiny over public expenditures, although there is no evident opposition recorded during the discussions surrounding this bill. However, the focus remains largely on the practical benefits expected from this legislative change.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.