Louisiana Senate Bill SB243

Louisiana 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/14/19
• Engrossed: 5/16/19
• Refer: 5/20/19
• Report Pass: 5/29/19
• Enrolled: 6/5/19
• Chaptered: 6/6/19
• Passed: 6/6/19

Caption

Creates the Dual Enrollment Framework Task Force. (gov sig) (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF EX See Note)

Impact

The bill has the potential to significantly enhance the educational landscape in Louisiana by providing high school students with greater access to college courses. This is likely to increase the number of students graduating with both high school diplomas and college credit, thus improving their preparedness for postsecondary education and job prospects. Additionally, it aims to standardize the dual enrollment system across various institutions, making it easier for students and schools to navigate their options.

Summary

Senate Bill 243 aims to improve the dual enrollment framework for high school students in Louisiana by establishing a Dual Enrollment Framework Task Force. This task force is tasked with developing a statewide strategy to ensure that all qualified juniors and seniors can access dual enrollment courses. By amending existing laws and creating guidelines for dual enrollment programs, the bill aims to facilitate smoother transitions for students from high school to postsecondary education, as well as create a structure for recognizing students’ achievements through dual credit.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 243 appears to be generally positive, especially among educators and administrators who see the benefits of dual enrollment programs in providing students with crucial skills and credits that can save time and money in their educational journeys. Supporters argue that by allowing more students to participate in dual enrollment, the state can enhance educational attainment and foster a more skilled workforce. There may, however, be ongoing discussions about resource allocation and ensuring equal access across diverse school districts.

Contention

While many support the establishment of the task force, there may be concerns regarding the implementation of the program and the precise guidelines that the task force will develop. Notably, discussions may arise about funding, as ensuring that all students can afford dual enrollment courses could be a contentious point. Additionally, there could be debates about the quality and consistency of the courses offered, ensuring they meet educational standards and properly articulate to degree programs in postsecondary institutions.