Provides an exception for certain applicants for employee permits seeking to work in locations permitted by ATC as a restaurant. (8/1/19)
The enactment of SB94 will likely lead to significant changes in state law regarding the employability of individuals with certain felony convictions in the restaurant industry. It softens the stringent historical barriers preventing those with non-violent felony convictions from obtaining employment in establishments that serve alcohol. By doing so, it promotes a more inclusive approach to rehabilitation, potentially increasing the workforce in the food service sector and allowing former offenders to gain a second chance at employment.
Senate Bill 94 (SB94) aims to provide specific exceptions for individuals seeking employee permits to work in restaurants regulated by the Alcohol and Tobacco Control (ATC) in Louisiana. The bill modifies existing eligibility criteria by allowing certain individuals with felony convictions to apply for such permits provided their offense was not a crime of violence, the distribution or possession of controlled substances classified under Schedule I, or a sexual offense. This initiative seeks to broaden employment opportunities for those who have served their time and are seeking reintegration into the workforce.
The overall sentiment surrounding SB94 appears to lean favorably among proponents who view it as a positive step towards criminal justice reform and expanded employment opportunities. Advocates argue that by creating exceptions for non-violent felonies, the bill supports rehabilitation efforts and acknowledges the need for second chances. However, there might be concerns from conservative circles about the appropriateness of employing individuals with certain past convictions in positions that serve the public.
Despite its merits, the bill may face contention from those who argue that allowing individuals with specific felony records to work in restaurants could pose risks, especially in establishments inducing alcohol. The balance between public safety and rehabilitation initiatives remains a key point of debate. The discussions could also include potential implications for businesses and their liability should any incidents arise involving these employees in establishments subject to ATC regulations.