Authorizes a net operating loss carry-back for purposes of the corporation income tax. (Item #20) (7/1/20) (OR DECREASE GF RV See Note)
The bill amends existing regulations that previously prohibited the carry-back of net operating loss deductions for corporate income tax. By enabling this carry-back option, the legislation seeks to simplify the process for businesses filing for deductions, thus potentially boosting their cash flow and encouraging reinvestment into operations and workforce. The measure also introduces provisions for the Department of Revenue to establish rules related to the implementation of these deductions, indicating a structured approach to its administration and ensuring compliance.
Senate Bill 22, authored by Senator McMath, proposes significant amendments to Louisiana's corporate income tax laws by allowing for a net operating loss carry-back. This allows corporations to apply net operating losses to previous taxable years, specifically those beginning on or after January 1, 2017 and before January 1, 2022. This measure is designed to provide relief to businesses that experience financial setbacks, allowing them to recoup taxes paid in profitable years, thereby promoting economic stability among corporations struggling during downturns.
The sentiment surrounding SB 22 appears to be generally supportive among business advocates who view it as a necessary measure to mitigate tax burdens during challenging financial periods. It has been posited that such a tax relief could assist in preventing corporate bankruptcies, thereby cushioning the overall economy. However, there may also be apprehension regarding the potential impact on state revenue due to the effects of the carried-back deductions, leading some policymakers to voice concern about long-term financial implications for the state budget.
While the discussions around SB 22 have largely been constructive, points of contention raised include the concern about the fiscal impact of allowing carry-backs and how this may affect future state funding for public services. Detractors argue that easing tax burdens for corporations could lead to budget shortfalls, challenging the state's ability to fund essential services. These dialogues have emphasized the balance between supporting businesses and ensuring robust state revenues, which is a fundamental area of debate in the legislative landscape.