Louisiana 2020 2nd Special Session

Louisiana House Bill HB41

Introduced
9/28/20  
Introduced
9/28/20  

Caption

Provides relative to the use of tax increment financing in Rapides Parish (Item #66) (OR SEE FISC NOTE LF RV)

Impact

The impact of HB41 is significant as it modifies the financial landscape for local governmental subdivisions by enabling Alexandria to finance or refinance designated economic development initiatives. This bill allows for the creation of a political subdivision that is empowered to enact financing measures for specific projects that could potentially revitalize areas within the city. By expanding the scope of TIF, it is anticipated that the bill will stimulate investment, improve public infrastructure, and enhance the economic viability of previously overlooked districts within Rapides Parish.

Summary

House Bill 41 (HB41) aims to expand the use of tax increment financing (TIF) in Rapides Parish, specifically allowing the city of Alexandria to utilize TIF for economic development projects within the North MacArthur Bolton Avenue Economic Development District. The legislation amends existing statutes that restrict TIF use and removes prohibitive measures that previously limited financial assistance to various sectors, including certain retail and gaming industries. The intent behind this bill is to enhance local economic growth and infrastructure development by providing the necessary funding through TIF mechanisms.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB41 appears to be largely positive among supporters who view it as a necessary tool for economic stimulus in the region. Proponents argue that the flexibility offered by TIF will facilitate job creation and attract new businesses, fostering long-term growth. However, opponents may express concern regarding the implications of increased financial flexibility, fearing that it could lead to misallocation of resources or insufficient oversight in the management of public funds allocated for development projects.

Contention

There are notable points of contention regarding HB41 primarily centered around the extent to which local governments should have the authority to leverage TIF for economic enhancement. While supporters advocate for local autonomy in funding development projects, critics may argue that the emphasis on TIF could undermine the fiscal integrity of local governments or disadvantage sectors that remain excluded from these financial incentives. The discussion highlights a broader debate on local governance, economic priorities, and the equitable distribution of financial opportunities across different economic sectors and communities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

AL SB260

Tax increment districts, redevelopment projects authorizes to continue through a subsequent tax increment district, Secs. 11-99-2, 11-99-4, 11-99-5, 11-99-6, 11-99-8, 11-99-10 am'd.

AL HB481

Tax increment districts, redevelopment projects authorizes to continue through a subsequent tax increment district, Secs. 11-99-2, 11-99-4, 11-99-5, 11-99-6, 11-99-8, 11-99-10 am'd.

HI HB1457

Relating To Tax Increment Financing.

NM SB293

Housing Study For Some Development Projects

MN SF261

Various pooling provisions clarification

MN HF880

Tax increment financing provisions modified, various pooling provisions clarified, administrative expense limitations clarified, and application of violations and remedies expanded.

CT HB07361

An Act Concerning The Adoption Of Master Plans By Tax Increment Districts.

WI AB96

Developer-financed tax incremental districts.