Louisiana House Bill HB162

Louisiana 2020 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/24/20
• Refer: 2/24/20
• Refer: 3/9/20
• Report Pass: 5/7/20

Caption

Provides relative to the use of tax increment financing in Rapides Parish

Impact

This bill's primary effect is to enhance local governmental capabilities in utilizing tax incentives for economic growth within the specified district. By creating the North MacArthur Bolton Avenue Economic Development District, Alexandria could attract new businesses and investments, which may lead to job creation and infrastructure improvements. The specificity of allowing tax increment financing for certain projects within this defined area aims to stimulate more efficient funding and resource allocation for developmental endeavors.

Summary

House Bill 162 seeks to amend tax increment financing regulations specifically in Rapides Parish, with a notable focus on the city of Alexandria. The bill aims to remove certain restrictions that limit the use of tax increment financing for economic development projects in the city. Instead of the broad restrictions currently in place, the proposed law allows Alexandria's governing authority to utilize this financing method within designated economic development districts, thus facilitating targeted economic initiatives aimed at bolstering local development.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 162 appears to be generally supportive among local stakeholders who see the bill as a vehicle for economic revitalization. Proponents argue that providing the city with the ability to use tax increment financing efficiently is necessary for improving the local economy and enhancing the quality of life for residents. While local supporters advocate for this bill as a means to foster growth, some may express concerns regarding potential pitfalls or the risk of prioritizing certain developments over community needs.

Contention

Despite the overall positive sentiment, there are points of contention regarding how tax increment financing will be managed and its long-term implications. Critics might voice concerns about ensuring that the financing truly benefits the wider community and does not solely favor particular businesses or sectors. The potential for misuse or misallocation of financial resources is an issue that advocates and opponents alike recognize must be addressed as the legislation moves forward.