Louisiana 2020 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB213

Introduced
2/24/20  
Refer
2/24/20  
Refer
2/24/20  
Refer
3/9/20  
Refer
3/9/20  
Report Pass
5/7/20  
Report Pass
5/7/20  
Engrossed
5/18/20  
Engrossed
5/18/20  
Report Pass
5/21/20  
Report Pass
5/21/20  
Enrolled
5/28/20  
Enrolled
5/28/20  
Chaptered
6/5/20  
Chaptered
6/5/20  
Passed
6/5/20  

Caption

Provides relative to the Louisiana Military Hall of Fame and Museum

Impact

By repealing the statutory framework that supports the Louisiana Military Hall of Fame and Museum, HB213 will likely affect the preservation and promotion of military history within the state. This change may lead to challenges in how military achievements and contributions are recognized and celebrated. Without the statutory support, there is uncertainty regarding the future operations and funding of the museum, which may impact public access to historical military artifacts and educational resources.

Summary

House Bill 213 proposes the repeal of Chapter 5-P of Title 25 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes. This chapter is related to the Louisiana Military Hall of Fame and Museum, effectively removing it from the jurisdiction of the Department of State. The bill aims to eliminate all statutory provisions that govern the museum and its board. The implications of this legislation could be significant, as it indicates a shift in how military history and culture are commemorated at the state level.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB213 appears to be generally supportive within the legislatures that voted on the bill, as indicated by the unanimous vote in the Senate (33-0). However, there may be underlying concerns among advocacy groups or communities that prioritize the recognition of military contributions. The lack of opposition during voting suggests a consensus on the need for legislative efficiency, although it could also signal a disregard for the concerns of stakeholders involved with the museum.

Contention

A notable point of contention arising from this bill could be the balance between legislative action and community legacy. Critics may argue that such a repeal undermines the recognition of military service and sacrifices made by individuals, while supporters of the bill might contend that it is a necessary administrative move. The debate centers on how best to honor military history, highlighting differing perspectives on state involvement versus community-driven initiatives.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.