Louisiana 2020 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB375

Introduced
2/27/20  
Introduced
2/27/20  
Refer
2/27/20  
Refer
2/27/20  
Refer
5/4/20  
Refer
5/4/20  
Report Pass
5/7/20  
Report Pass
5/7/20  
Engrossed
5/18/20  
Engrossed
5/18/20  
Report Pass
5/27/20  
Report Pass
5/27/20  
Enrolled
6/1/20  
Enrolled
6/1/20  
Chaptered
6/11/20  
Chaptered
6/11/20  
Passed
6/11/20  

Caption

Provides relative to gravity drainage districts in Calcasieu Parish

Impact

This bill primarily impacts the financial and operational structure of the gravity drainage districts in Calcasieu Parish, particularly in how board members are compensated for their service. By establishing clear limits on per diem payments, the legislature aims to enhance financial oversight and accountability within these districts. The adjustments reflect a broader initiative to regulate compensation practices among public boards, ensuring that payment structures remain reasonable and within defined bounds, which could also influence similar regulations in other districts statewide.

Summary

House Bill 375, passed by the Louisiana legislature, modifies provisions related to gravity drainage districts in Calcasieu Parish. The bill specifically addresses the per diem compensation for members of the governing boards of these drainage districts. Under the new legislation, members will be limited to receiving payment for no more than 36 meetings per year, with exceptions for specific districts where members can receive payment for up to 48 meetings. Additionally, one elected officer can earn a per diem for 12 additional days of administrative duties, contingent on approval by a two-thirds majority of the board.

Sentiment

General sentiment around HB 375 appears to be supportive, especially among lawmakers who view the measures as necessary for improving transparency and preventing potential abuse regarding meeting compensation. The unanimous support in the House vote suggests a consensus on the importance of regulating public service payments. However, there may be underlying concerns from certain community members regarding sufficient compensation for the responsibilities borne by board members, which could evoke a mixed response in terms of public perception.

Contention

Despite the bill's straightforward approach, there may be contention regarding the limits imposed on per diem payments, particularly among some members who feel that the constraints could deter participation in meetings. The bill's specification regarding additional compensation for administrative duties may also spark discussion about the fairness of such provisions in comparison to regular members. As gravity drainage districts play crucial roles in local infrastructure and flood control, the balance between proper compensation and responsible governance will likely remain a point of debate among stakeholders.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.