Louisiana 2020 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB413

Introduced
2/27/20  
Introduced
2/27/20  
Refer
2/27/20  
Refer
2/27/20  
Refer
5/4/20  

Caption

Provides relative to the approval of the annual capitol and operating budgets of the Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans

Impact

The implications of HB 413 are significant, as it modifies the existing framework established under R.S. 33:4071, which gave the Sewerage and Water Board considerable autonomy. By requiring the board to seek city council approval for its budgets, the bill aims to integrate more stringent financial accountability within the governance structure of the water and sewer services. This legislative change could enhance transparency in the use of public funds and foster better alignment with the city's overall fiscal strategies.

Summary

House Bill 413 addresses the fiscal governance of the Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans by making the approval of its annual capital and operating budgets contingent on the New Orleans city council. This move is intended to enhance financial oversight and ensure alignment between the Water Board's budgetary decisions and the city council’s policy objectives. Under this proposed law, if the city council does not approve a proposed budget, the Water Board will continue to operate under the previous fiscal year’s budget until a new budget is approved.

Sentiment

Opinions surrounding HB 413 are mixed, reflecting broader concerns about local governance and financial management. Supporters argue that additional oversight by the city council will lead to better resource allocation and responsiveness to community needs. Conversely, critics contend that too much oversight may diminish the Water Board's operational efficiency and autonomy, creating potential delays in budgeting processes that could adversely affect service delivery.

Contention

The key points of contention lie in the balance between financial oversight and operational efficiency. Advocates of the bill believe that this oversight is necessary to protect public interests and ensure that the board’s expenditures align with community standards and requirements. Meanwhile, those against it fear that the increased regulation may slow down the Water Board's ability to respond swiftly to urgent fiscal needs or emergencies, thus impacting service continuity for residents.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.