Louisiana 2020 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB420

Introduced
2/27/20  
Refer
2/27/20  
Refer
3/9/20  
Refer
3/9/20  
Report Pass
3/12/20  
Engrossed
5/11/20  
Refer
5/12/20  
Refer
5/12/20  
Report Pass
5/19/20  
Report Pass
5/19/20  
Enrolled
5/22/20  
Enrolled
5/22/20  
Chaptered
6/9/20  
Chaptered
6/9/20  
Passed
6/9/20  

Caption

Provides relative to minimum training requirements for law enforcement officers

Impact

If enacted, HB 420 would have a significant impact on the training regimen of law enforcement officers in the state, providing flexibility for officers who may face circumstances preventing them from fulfilling the standard training requirements. This could create a more supportive environment for peace officers, especially those who are also serving in the military or who encounter extenuating circumstances affecting their ability to comply with training policies. The bill was introduced to ensure that the training requirements remain achievable while still maintaining a standard of competency for law enforcement personnel.

Summary

House Bill 420 seeks to amend the training requirements for peace officers in Louisiana by establishing exceptions to the annual training requirements. The bill specifies that all full-time, part-time, or reserve peace officers must complete a minimum of twenty hours of prescribed in-service training annually, with initial training requirements to be completed within the first calendar year after obtaining P.O.S.T. certification. The bill introduces the possibility of modifying, extending, or waiving these training requirements under certain circumstances, such as medical leave or emergencies. Additionally, peace officers called to active military duty are exempt from completing any missed in-service training during their service time.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 420 appears largely supportive, particularly among organizations and individuals advocating for the well-being of law enforcement personnel. The flexibility introduced by potential waivers can be seen as a progressive step in acknowledging the diverse challenges faced by peace officers. However, some concerns may arise regarding the potential for inconsistent training standards, which could affect the overall preparedness and effectiveness of peace officers in serving their communities.

Contention

Despite its supportive nature, some stakeholders may argue against the adjustments proposed in HB 420, specifically concerning the balance between flexibility and the necessity of rigorous training for peace officers. Critics might contend that while waivers and modifications are necessary for compassion towards officers, they could also lead to lower standards in training compliance. Overall, the discussion around this bill reflects a broader conversation about how best to support law enforcement while ensuring adequate preparation for public safety.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.