Louisiana House Bill HB647

Louisiana 2020 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/28/20
• Refer: 2/28/20
• Refer: 3/9/20
• Report Pass: 5/15/20
• Engrossed: 5/25/20
• Report Pass: 5/27/20
• Enrolled: 5/29/20
• Chaptered: 6/12/20
• Passed: 6/12/20

Caption

Authorizes the East Baton Rouge Redevelopment Authority to use a trade name

Impact

The passage of HB 647 is expected to have a positive impact on the operational dynamics of the East Baton Rouge Redevelopment Authority. By allowing the authority to adopt a trade name, the bill aims to foster greater public recognition and engagement with the redevelopment initiatives. It is anticipated that this strategic move will help streamline tasks related to urban redevelopment and foster collaboration between the authority and community stakeholders.

Summary

House Bill 647 authorizes the East Baton Rouge Redevelopment Authority to utilize a trade name, specifically 'Build Baton Rouge'. This amendment aims to enhance the branding and operational capacities of the authority, enabling it to operate more effectively in its redevelopment efforts within the parish of East Baton Rouge. The legislation emphasizes the continuous existence of the Redevelopment Authority, further emphasizing its role in local urban development and revitalization projects.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 647 appears to be largely supportive, with local officials and members of the community expressing positive views on the potential benefits this would bring to urban planning and development efforts. The ability to use a trade name is seen as a modern approach that could contribute to a more effective public image and community involvement, which are vital for the successes of redevelopment projects.

Contention

While there has not been significant contention reported regarding the passage of HB 647, the broader discussion surrounding urban redevelopment policies often involves debates over local governance and stakeholder engagement. The bill's implications for local governance ahead could lead to discussions about the balance of authority in urban planning efforts, and whether such naming conventions adequately reflect community identity.