Louisiana House Bill HB696

Louisiana 2020 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/28/20
• Refer: 2/28/20
• Refer: 3/9/20

Caption

To extend the maximum term for a lease or sublease entered into by the Office Facilities Corporation and to remove legislative oversight for certain leases (OR SEE FISC NOTE)

Impact

The implications of HB696 on state laws primarily concern the governance of the Office Facilities Corporation and its relationship with state legislative oversight. By eliminating the twenty-year cap on leases and removing the Joint Legislative Committee on the Budget's (JLCB) approval requirement for specific leases, the bill seeks to facilitate efficiency in property management and utilization. Supporters argue that these changes will foster expedited leasing agreements and promote effective use of state resources, particularly in accommodating state agencies and their operational needs.

Summary

House Bill 696 aims to extend the maximum term for a lease or sublease entered into by the Office Facilities Corporation, allowing them to potentially extend contracts beyond the current limit of twenty years. Additionally, HB696 seeks to remove the requirement for legislative oversight regarding certain leases, which would enable the corporation to operate with greater autonomy. This legislative change is framed as a means to streamline the leasing process, possibly enhancing efforts to accommodate various state agencies in designated properties, particularly those within the New Orleans Centre area.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB696 appears to be cautiously supportive among its proponents, who maintain that the bill will facilitate better operational efficiency and flexibility. However, there may be underlying concerns about the potential lack of accountability given the removal of legislative oversight. Critics may argue that without scrutiny, there is a risk of mismanagement or unfavorable lease terms, delivering a mixed perception of the bill’s overall reception within the legislative body.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB696 may revolve around the balance of authority between the Office Facilities Corporation and the legislature. Specifically, concerns may arise regarding the potential for diminished oversight of public assets and the long-term impacts of extending lease terms without legislative approval. Detractors may argue that such changes could undermine transparency and accountability in the management of state properties, suggesting a need for careful consideration and review of the proposed changes.