Louisiana House Bill HB698

Louisiana 2020 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/28/20
• Refer: 2/28/20
• Refer: 3/9/20

Caption

Provides procurement preference for goods manufactured and services performed by individuals with disabilities through supported employment providers (OR SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)

Impact

The bill aims to positively impact state laws regarding procurement by mandating that state agencies prioritize items and services produced by individuals with disabilities. By creating a preference for these products, Louisiana is taking steps to bolster the supported employment sector, allowing these individuals to gain meaningful employment and improve their quality of life. It mandates the establishment of the State Use Council to oversee the designation of items and ensure compliance with the preferences set forth by the legislation.

Summary

House Bill 698 seeks to enhance procurement preferences for goods manufactured and services performed by individuals with disabilities, specifically through supported employment providers. Its primary goal is to create a formal procedure allowing state agencies, boards, commissions, and departments to classify certain products and services as 'mandatory-use' items, which must be procured from designated providers unless specific exemptions apply. This initiative aims to improve employment opportunities and economic integration for individuals with disabilities by ensuring their contributions are recognized in state procurement processes.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HB 698 appears to be supportive, reflecting a societal shift towards inclusivity and empowering individuals with disabilities. Proponents of the bill argue that it represents an essential step in promoting equal access to employment opportunities and encouraging state agencies to leverage the skills of individuals with disabilities. However, some concerns may be raised about the practicality of the mandatory-use provisions and the potential burden on agencies to comply with these requirements.

Contention

Although the bill predominantly enjoys favorable support, some points of contention could arise regarding the exemptions outlined within the legislation. Critics may argue that the exemptions could impact the effectiveness of the procurement preference, diluting the intent of the bill. Concerns might also be raised over the administrative burden placed on state agencies to navigate the requirements associated with the mandatory-use designations, as well as the potential quality and pricing comparisons between supported employment providers and traditional suppliers.