Louisiana 2020 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB757

Introduced
3/31/20  
Introduced
3/31/20  
Refer
5/4/20  
Refer
5/4/20  
Report Pass
5/7/20  
Report Pass
5/7/20  
Engrossed
5/18/20  
Engrossed
5/18/20  
Report Pass
5/26/20  
Report Pass
5/26/20  
Enrolled
5/29/20  
Enrolled
5/29/20  
Chaptered
6/11/20  
Chaptered
6/11/20  
Passed
6/11/20  

Caption

To change the name of the Slidell City Court

Impact

The enactment of HB 757 directly modifies the legal framework governing the City Court in Slidell, including defining the jurisdictional limits for civil and criminal matters. It establishes a lower salary limit for court judges financed by local municipalities and alters how excess fees collected in court cases can be utilized, thereby impacting financial allocations for court operations. Such modifications are intended to enhance the efficiency of the judicial process and address local governance needs in St. Tammany Parish.

Summary

House Bill 757 proposes to amend various statutes regarding the City Court of Slidell, renaming it the City Court of East St. Tammany. This bill aims to streamline the judicial processes in the area, clarifying the jurisdiction, salary of judges, and various procedural aspects of the court. Changes include adjustments to the compensation structure for judges and provisions regarding operational expenses from court fees, fundamentally shifting how local judiciary services are managed and funded.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 757 appears to be supportive, particularly among local legislative bodies aiming to modernize and improve judicial efficiency in the City Court system. However, there exist concerns among some stakeholders about the long-term effects of changes in court funding and the implications this could have on legal processes and access to justice within the community.

Contention

Notable points of contention primarily revolve around the amendments to compensation and operational expenditures of the court. While proponents argue that the changes will lead to better management and utilization of resources, opponents worry that lower judge salaries may affect the quality of judicial services. Furthermore, the altered provisions for utilizing court fees could lead to uncertainties regarding the sustainability of funding for essential court operations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB304

Criminal procedure: prosecutorial jurisdiction in multi-jurisdictional elder abuse cases.

CA AB1746

Criminal procedure: jurisdiction of public offenses.

CA AB806

Criminal procedure: crimes in multiple jurisdictions.

CA AB368

Criminal procedure: jurisdiction of public offenses.

CA AB1572

Integrated waste management plans: source reduction and recycling element: review schedule.

CA AB3178

Integrated waste management plans: source reduction and recycling element: diversion requirements.

CA AB815

Integrated waste management plans: source reduction and recycling element and household hazardous waste element: dual stream recycling programs.

CA AB1779

Theft: jurisdiction.