Louisiana House Bill HB795

Louisiana 2020 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/31/20
• Refer: 5/4/20

Caption

Requires the Lafitte, Crown Point, and Barataria levee projects to be completed prior to the completion of the Mid-Barataria Sediment Diversion project

Impact

The implications of HB 795 are significant as it alters the timeline and priorities for coastal restoration projects in Louisiana. By requiring the completion of the levee projects first, the bill is intended to ensure enhanced flood protection for communities in those areas before undertaking sediment diversion efforts which can be complex and time-consuming. Supporters believe that completing levee projects will provide immediate benefits to the affected areas, while ensuring residents and businesses are better protected from flooding events.

Summary

House Bill 795 focuses on the state of Louisiana's coastal protection initiatives, specifically mandating that the Lafitte, Crown Point, and Barataria levee projects be completed before the Mid-Barataria Sediment Diversion project can proceed. This bill emphasizes the importance of prioritizing levee construction in flood-prone regions, addressing critical flood risks presented by Louisiana's unique geological and meteorological conditions. The bill is part of a broader effort to bolster the state's defenses against storm surges and rising sea levels, which threaten both communities and ecosystems.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 795 appears to be largely positive among proponents of coastal restoration and flood protection. Legislators and stakeholders recognize the critical importance of levees in safeguarding infrastructure and reducing catastrophic flood damage. Conversely, some skepticism may arise regarding the feasibility of adhering to the new timeline and the potential for delays in the sediment diversion project, which is also crucial for long-term ecological stability and land-building efforts.

Contention

Notable points of contention may include concerns from environmental advocates about whether prioritizing levee construction could detract from the overall coastal restoration strategy that includes sediment diversion. Critics may argue that focusing too narrowly on levee projects could lead to a false sense of security while ultimately neglecting the broader ecological restoration required to combat coastal erosion and habitat loss in the region. The balancing act between immediate flood protection and sustainable environmental practices will likely be a central theme in discussions around HB 795.