Louisiana House Bill HB97

Louisiana 2020 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/18/20
• Refer: 2/18/20
• Refer: 3/9/20
• Report Pass: 5/7/20
• Engrossed: 5/15/20
• Refer: 5/18/20
• Report Pass: 5/21/20
• Enrolled: 5/27/20
• Chaptered: 6/4/20
• Passed: 6/4/20

Caption

Removes certain limitations on the exemption from local match requirements for certain rural water system projects (EN NO IMPACT GF EX See Note)

Impact

The implications of HB 97 are significant for rural communities in Louisiana. By lessening the financial barriers to accessing state funding, the bill aims to support improvements in water services, which are crucial for public health and community development. This legislative change is anticipated to allow for increased investment in rural water projects, leading to upgrades and expansions that can better serve a population that is often underserved. This could enhance not only the quality of water services but also the overall quality of life in these regions.

Summary

House Bill 97 aims to amend existing legislation concerning capital outlay projects, particularly those involving rural water systems. The primary change introduced by this bill is the removal of certain limitations on the exemption from local match requirements for rural water systems servicing fewer than 1,250 customers. By relaxing these restrictions, the bill intends to facilitate better access to state funding for small, rural communities that might struggle to meet match requirements, thereby enhancing their water infrastructure and services.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 97 appears to be largely positive, particularly among representatives and stakeholders advocating for rural development. The proposed changes are viewed favorably by those who believe that improved water infrastructure is vital for rural areas to thrive. The unanimous passing in the Senate, with 36 votes in favor and none against, underscores a collective recognition of the need for enhanced support for rural water systems. However, discussions regarding the availability of funding and the impact on state budgets remain relevant concerns in broader discussions about resource allocation.

Contention

While HB 97 has garnered support, some points of contention may arise concerning its potential implications for state funding and priorities. Critics may argue that while the intentions are commendable, there could be challenges in ensuring that the funds are adequately monitored and efficiently utilized by the local entities. Additionally, there could be discussions related to the long-term sustainability of these funding provisions and their impact on other state projects or obligations.