Provides relative to House Legislative Services employees and duties of the Clerk of the House
The impact of HR13 on state laws is primarily procedural, as it refines the operational underpinnings of the House. By clearly delineating the responsibilities of the House Legislative Services, the resolution enhances the capacity of the House to efficiently manage legislative research and drafting functions. This ensures that the House operates with a well-defined structure and that its members are effectively supported in their legislative endeavors. The repeal of House Rule 2.10(D)(5) signifies a deliberate shift in how external entities interact with legislative staff, reinforcing the authority of the House over its resources.
House Resolution 13 (HR13) proposes amendments to the Rules of Order of the House of Representatives in Louisiana, specifically targeting House Rule 3.5(A) concerning House Legislative Services and the duties of the Clerk of the House. The resolution seeks to enhance the efficiency and supervisory structure of legislative services, which includes research, bill drafting, and providing objective reports. Furthermore, it establishes clear boundaries regarding the support these services can offer to special commissions or entities that are not primarily composed of House members.
The sentiment around HR13 appears to be generally positive, as there is a recognition of the need for a streamlined and effective legislative process. Supporters of the amendment likely view it as a necessary step towards improving the operational capabilities of the House, thereby fostering a more effective legislative environment. However, some concerns may exist regarding the limitations placed on support for commissions and entities, which could restrict collaborative efforts outside the House framework.
While HR13 seeks to reinforce the internal procedural integrity of the House of Representatives, it could face criticism from those advocating for broader legislative support mechanisms. The amendment's implication of restricting House Legislative Services support to primarily House-controlled entities may raise concerns about the collaboration needed for comprehensive legislative work. Notably, the changes are indicative of a tension between maintaining legislative independence and the need for extended interaction with external bodies during the legislative process.