Provides for membership. (2/3 - CA10s29(F)) (6/30/20) (OR INCREASE APV)
The bill's passage is expected to result in an increase in the actuarial costs associated with the retirement systems due to a larger number of employees being integrated into TRSL, which has a higher benefit rate. The fiscal implications suggest that TRSL will see an increase in revenues as more employees may opt to transfer over, potentially enhancing the financial stability and payout capability of the TRSL. Conversely, PERS will likely face a decline in contributions as members leave for TRSL, resulting in reduced assets over time.
Senate Bill 17 (SB17) focuses on the membership structure of public retirement systems in Louisiana, specifically affecting employees of the Louisiana School Boards Association. The bill mandates that these employees, effective June 30, 2020, transition from the Parochial Employees' Retirement System (PERS) to the Teachers' Retirement System of Louisiana (TRSL). This transition provides current employees the option to transfer their service credits from PERS to TRSL, which aims to optimize their pension benefits given that TRSL generally offers better rates and conditions.
Discussion around SB17 appears to be generally supportive, especially among those who advocate for enhancements in retirement benefits for school-associated employees. Supporters argue that the bill allows employees to benefit from the stronger terms offered by TRSL, indicating a positive sentiment towards improving employee welfare in public education sectors. Opponents, albeit fewer in number, may raise concerns regarding the financial strain placed on PERS and the long-term sustainability of the retirement funding when significant numbers migrate to TRSL.
While SB17 aims to present beneficial outcomes for employees, the bill raises critical points of contention surrounding the financial balancing act required for managing two distinct retirement systems. The adjustments in contributions and the shifting of members between retirement systems could lead to financial instability for PERS if not managed correctly. Thus, while the immediate changes are perceived positively, the long-term implications for the state's retirement landscape warrant careful scrutiny to prevent adverse effects on the funding of these vital retirement systems.