Requires a notice to be posted upon the withdrawal or disqualification of a candidate's name that remains on the ballot. (8/1/20) (EN NO IMPACT See Note)
The enactment of SB 173 impacts state laws by making it necessary for election officials, particularly registrars and clerks of court, to take proactive steps in notifying voters of any changes concerning candidates on the ballot. Failure to post such notices will not void the election, but the law aims to provide voters with essential information, potentially increasing voter confidence in the electoral process. This change could also lead to increased accountability among election officials, as they must ensure proper communication regarding candidates.
Senate Bill 173 amends existing Louisiana election laws by establishing specific requirements for posting notices regarding the withdrawal or disqualification of candidates on ballots. The bill mandates that if a candidate's name appears on the ballot and they are withdrawn or disqualified by a court, notices must be prominently displayed at early voting locations and polling places. This is intended to ensure that voters are adequately informed about changes to candidates that could affect their voting decisions. The requirement emphasizes the importance of transparency and accuracy in the electoral process.
Overall, the sentiment around SB 173 seems to be positive, as it addresses a significant aspect of electoral integrity. Advocates believe that having a structured process for notifying voters of candidate withdrawals and disqualifications enhances the democratic process. However, there may be some concerns among election officials regarding the logistical challenges of effectively implementing the notice requirements, particularly in managing timely and accurate communication to voters.
While SB 173 predominantly received support, areas of contention could arise concerning the practical implications of enforcing the posting requirements, especially in larger jurisdictions with numerous polling locations. The bill's mention of 'failure to post' not voiding the election might raise questions about the sufficiency of the proposed measures and the adequacy of voter information. Additionally, some may debate whether this legislative change sufficiently addresses broader concerns about electoral transparency and the potential impact on voter turnout.