Requires a contractor for a state capital outlay project to designate no less than two percent of man-hours in any apprenticeable occupation to registered apprentices. (8/1/20) (OR SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)
The bill's enactment could significantly influence state laws concerning employment practices, especially in public sector contracts. By imposing apprenticeship requirements, SB250 encourages the integration of apprentices into skilled trades, potentially leading to enhanced job readiness and opportunities for young people. Additionally, the requirement for waivers when insufficient apprentices are available allows for flexibility in project execution, ensuring that contractors can still meet their obligations without sacrificing project timelines.
Senate Bill 250, introduced by Senator Carter, mandates that any contractor awarded a capital outlay project by the state of Louisiana designates at least 2% of their project man-hours to registered apprentices. This bill, which took effect on August 1, 2020, aims to bolster employment opportunities and promote workforce training in various apprenticeable occupations, as defined by the U.S. Department of Labor. By ensuring that a portion of work hours are allocated to apprentices, the bill seeks to develop a skilled labor market, particularly focusing on youth employment in the construction sector.
The sentiment surrounding SB250 appears to be predominantly positive, with advocates highlighting its potential to provide valuable training and experience for apprentices. Supporters argue that this approach is essential for addressing workforce shortages in skilled trades, thus serving both economic and educational purposes. However, there may be concerns regarding how effectively the waiver process would work, and whether contractors would consistently adhere to the apprenticeship requirements or seek to exploit the waiver provision.
While the bill has garnered support on the grounds of enhancing workforce development, some critics may contend that the 2% man-hour requirement could impose additional burdens on contractors. Questions could arise regarding the practicality of finding enough registered apprentices to meet this requirement consistently. This issue could lead to debates over the effectiveness of the waiver system, and challenges related to its implementation and monitoring might be expected, especially in local contexts where apprenticeship programs may not be as robust.