Louisiana 2020 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB270

Introduced
2/27/20  
Introduced
2/27/20  
Refer
2/27/20  
Refer
2/27/20  
Refer
3/9/20  
Refer
3/9/20  
Report Pass
5/13/20  
Report Pass
5/13/20  
Engrossed
5/15/20  
Engrossed
5/15/20  
Refer
5/18/20  
Report Pass
5/20/20  
Report Pass
5/20/20  
Enrolled
5/31/20  
Enrolled
5/31/20  
Chaptered
6/11/20  
Chaptered
6/11/20  
Passed
6/11/20  

Caption

Increases the daily compensation paid to jurors in civil cases. (1/1/21) (EN NO IMPACT See Note)

Impact

The implications of SB 270 are significant as they represent a step towards recognizing the importance of juror participation in the legal system. By increasing juror compensation and mileage reimbursement, the bill aims to encourage civic duty and alleviate some financial burdens associated with serving on a jury. This amendment could potentially increase the number of individuals willing to serve, thereby enhancing the pool of jurors and improving the fairness of trials in Louisana.

Summary

Senate Bill 270 increases the daily compensation for jurors in civil cases from twenty-five to fifty dollars. It also revises the mileage reimbursement rate to align it with the rate established for state officials. This amendment seeks to improve the conditions for jurors, acknowledging their role in the judicial process and addressing issues of fairness in compensation for time and travel involved in jury service. The changes are set to take effect on January 1, 2021.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 270 appears to be largely positive. The bill received unanimous support in the Senate, underscoring a bipartisan acknowledgment of the need to support juror participation. Legislators generally view the bill as a necessary enhancement of the judicial system, which helps ensure that jurors are adequately compensated for their service, thus promoting a more equitable legal process.

Contention

While the vote on SB 270 was unanimous, there may have been underlying concerns related to the broader implications of funding such increases in juror compensation. Some might argue about the source of funding for this amendment and whether it would place additional strain on court budgets. However, such concerns did not manifest in opposition during the bill's passage, indicating a consensus on the necessity of the adjustment.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.