Louisiana Senate Bill SB36

Louisiana 2020 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/17/20
• Refer: 2/17/20
• Refer: 3/9/20
• Report Pass: 5/7/20
• Engrossed: 5/13/20
• Report Pass: 5/20/20
• Enrolled: 5/28/20
• Chaptered: 6/11/20
• Passed: 6/11/20

Caption

Provides for the acceptance of a notice of candidacy. (gov sig) (EN NO IMPACT See Note)

Impact

The implications of SB36 are significant for the state's election administration. By limiting the ability of election officials to scrutinize candidates' qualifications, it alters the landscape of candidate registration. This change could potentially lower the barriers for participation in elections, allowing more individuals to run for office. However, it also raises concerns about the integrity of the election process and whether it adequately ensures that candidates meet appropriate standards before appearing on the ballot.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 36, proposed by Senator Bernard, amends the Louisiana Revised Statutes regarding the process of accepting a notice of candidacy for primary elections. The bill establishes that upon receiving a notice that meets the legal requirements, the secretary of state or clerk of court must accept it without discretion to verify the candidate's qualifications. This creates a mandatory and ministerial process whereby the qualifications are endorsed officially, but cannot be subjected to verification by these officials.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB36 appears to be largely supportive among those who believe in increasing accessibility to the electoral process, allowing more candidates to qualify for elections without excessive barriers. However, there is a notable concern from other factions regarding the potential for this to lead to a decline in the quality of candidates and questions around voter trust in the electoral system. Overall, the reception of the bill indicates a tension between facilitating participation and maintaining rigorous standards.

Contention

Key points of contention include the balance between encouraging a broader range of candidates and ensuring election integrity. Supporters argue that the bill promotes inclusivity in political candidacy, while critics express concern that it may undermine the checks and balances designed to safeguard elections. The debate reflects a deeper discussion within the political sphere about the appropriate level of oversight in electoral processes and the implications of allowing unchecked candidacy.