California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2577

Introduced
2/18/22  
Introduced
2/18/22  
Refer
3/10/22  
Refer
3/10/22  
Report Pass
4/18/22  
Refer
4/19/22  
Refer
4/19/22  
Report Pass
4/27/22  
Report Pass
4/27/22  
Refer
4/27/22  
Refer
5/11/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Engrossed
5/23/22  
Engrossed
5/23/22  
Refer
5/24/22  
Refer
5/24/22  
Refer
6/1/22  
Report Pass
6/8/22  
Report Pass
6/8/22  
Refer
6/8/22  
Refer
6/8/22  
Report Pass
6/13/22  
Report Pass
6/13/22  
Refer
6/13/22  
Refer
6/13/22  
Enrolled
8/1/22  
Enrolled
8/1/22  
Chaptered
8/15/22  
Chaptered
8/15/22  
Passed
8/15/22  

Caption

Elections: uniform filing forms.

Impact

The implementation of AB 2577 reflects a shift in state law that emphasizes the need for uniformity in election-related procedures. By mandating standard forms, the bill could reduce the bureaucratic burden on candidates and local election officials alike. In times where many candidates may find navigating election laws overwhelming, this legislative change serves to simplify that process. The new regulations could lead to a more inclusive political environment where individuals feel empowered to run for office without being deterred by procedural complexities.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2577, introduced by Bigelow, focuses on streamlining the election process in California by requiring the Secretary of State to create uniform filing forms for candidates. This legislation aims to ensure consistency and clarity in the submission of declarations of candidacy and nomination papers across the state. It addresses existing practices that can create confusion among candidates and their supporters regarding the filing processes required to appear on primary election ballots. By imposing this requirement, the bill seeks to make the electoral process more accessible and efficient for potential candidates.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 2577 appears to be broadly positive, with many stakeholders recognizing the benefits of having standardized procedures. Supporters argue that uniform filing forms could eliminate confusion and errors that have historically marred the candidacy filing process. However, there may be dissent regarding how the implementations will be managed at county levels, with some local officials expressing concern about the flexibility needed to cater to local election nuances.

Contention

While the bill is generally supported, there are points of contention regarding its potential implications on local governance and election management. Some critics worry that uniformity might overlook critical locality-specific needs or adaptations that have been cultivated over time. As the Secretary of State prepares to establish these forms, balancing statewide consistency with local operational realities will be essential to ensure that the electoral system remains both fair and functional.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NV AB95

Makes various changes relating to public office. (BDR 24-445)

CA AB2582

Elections omnibus bill.

LA HB443

Requires the secretary of state to compare the names of candidates with certain criminal history records and to inform the district attorney of his findings under certain circumstances

CT SB01047

An Act Concerning Ballot Access For Petitioning Candidates.

CA AB1784

Primary elections: candidate withdrawals.

NV SB53

Revises provisions relating to elections. (BDR 24-411)

OH HB467

Creates an exemption to candidate disclosure of name change

CT HB06110

An Act Requiring Joint Campaigning By Candidates For Governor And Lieutenant Governor In Primaries.